Joe Biden says US has evacuated 12,000 more people from Kabul
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
While the United States has other sources of information, including electronic eavesdropping by the National Security Agency, it lacks the in-country spy network Israel has, meaning Biden’s administration has become more dependent on Israel for information on Iran.
Anonymous Israeli and American officials spoke to the New York Times about classified operations relating to the dependency referring to an incident in April when Israel set off explosives at Iran’s Natanz nuclear plant and snubbed the US leadership in the process.
The officials say that the United States were given less than two hours’ notice by Israel’s foreign intelligence agency, the Mossad; far too short a time for the United States to assess the operation or ask Israel to call it off.
The move came as Israeli officials claim they took “the precaution” as Americans had leaked information about some Israeli operations, but this has been denied by US officials.
Other Israeli officials also claim the Biden administration had been “inattentive to their security concerns” and instead remained too focused on reviving the Iran nuclear agreement that President Trump had previously pulled out of.
The last-minute notification of the explosive operation was the most obvious example that Israel had changed its procedures since the Trump presidency, and shows the snub of President Biden’s lead.
According to Senior Biden administration officials, the move was interpreted as a violation of a “longstanding, unwritten agreement” with the Israelis “to at least advise the United States of covert operations, giving Washington a chance to object.”
Israel’s new prime minister, Naftali Bennett, meets with the US President at the White House today, and the pair must tackle the rebuilding of this trust as they continue to pursue contradictory agendas on Iran.
For Mr Bennett, the trip hopes to be an opportunity to build better relations with the US, and seek support for covert attacks on Iran’s nuclear program.
Israeli officials say that the approach needs to be force-led in order to stop Iran from building an atomic bomb, while the Biden administration favours a more diplomatic political approach that intends to revive and build on the 2015 nuclear agreement.
The nuclear agreement with Iran has been criticised by Israel in the past and is something that has only been brought to prevalence again under the US’ new leadership.
The two countries have a longstanding history of cooperation and operated together during the Trump administration.
Iran paid Taliban ‘bounties’ to attack US airbase – intelligence [REVEAL]
Rise in assaults between Israel and Iran may result in an open war [REPORT]
Joe Biden: Polls slam President’s Afghanistan withdrawal ‘crisis’ [POLL]
However, the US approach changed when Joe Biden was elected, as the President promised to restore the nuclear agreement with Iran that Israel so vigorously opposed.
The restoration idea was snubbed by Israel’s then-president Benjamin Netanyahu, as he cut intelligence sharing with the United States because he did not trust the Biden administration.
According to senior Israeli officials, a priority of the White House visit for Mr Bennett is to determine whether President Biden will continue to support Israel’s covert operations against Iran’s nuclear program.
The officials hope that any new deal struck with Iran will not limit the operations, which have previously included sabotage of Iranian nuclear facilities and the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists.
Maj. Gen. Aharon Zeevi Farkash, a former director of Israeli military intelligence, commented on the sharing of intelligence and operational activity between Israel and the United States as being “one of the most important subjects on the agenda for the meeting”.
He referred to Israel’s “developed unique capabilities for intelligence collection in a number of enemy countries” and stated that these were “capabilities that the United States was not able to grow on its own and without which its national security would be vulnerable. ”
Source: Read Full Article